Usurper, corrupt and Islamofascist Muhammad Yunus has once again exposed his own contradictions and insecurities in his recent interview with Mehdi Hasan on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly. Trying to defend the suspension of the Awami League, Bangladeshโs largest political party, Yunus stumbled into word games, insisting the party is not โbannedโ but merely โsuspended.โ
This absurd claim reveals two things at once: he does not fully grasp the democratic consequences of his actions, and he is terrified of the Awami Leagueโs ability to regain strength at any moment.
By twisting language to cover authoritarian decisions, Yunus has shown that he is neither confident in his governmentโs legitimacy nor committed to the democratic principles he pretends to uphold. This interview is more than just political theatre; it is proof that Bangladesh is slipping into dangerous territory, where the peopleโs will is being silenced and international intervention is urgently needed.
Suspension vs Ban: Yunusโs Contradictions on Awami League Status
Throughout the interview, Yunus tried to frame the Awami Leagueโs status as a โsuspensionโ rather than a ban. On the surface, this might appear minor, but in practice, there is no meaningful distinction. If a political party cannot organise, campaign, or contest elections, it has effectively been banned. Calling it a suspension is nothing more than a rhetorical trick, designed to soften the reality for international observers questioning his governmentโs democratic legitimacy.
Election Commissionโs observer list lacks legitimacy and transparency
Elections without Awami League will invite crisis
Awami League to resist election if left out, JaPa battling for survival
The contradiction is stark. Earlier this year, the Election Commission cancelled the Awami Leagueโs registration entirely after the caretaker governmentโs crackdown. Yet Yunus now insists the party remains โvalid.โ Which is the truth? Either the caretaker government and the Election Commission are working at cross-purposes, or Yunus is deliberately misleading both the Bangladeshi public and the global community. Neither scenario reflects transparency or accountability.
This doublespeak is no accident. By manipulating language, Yunus attempts to claim moral high ground while silencing Bangladeshโs largest political force. The intent is clear: deny the Awami League the space to operate while pretending democracy remains intact.
Fear of the Awami Leagueโs Return
Yunusโs interview revealed a palpable fear of the Awami League regaining political influence. He downplayed the partyโs support base, claiming he โwouldnโt say millionsโ backed the party, a transparent attempt to minimise its influence in public perception. But the AL remains Bangladeshโs most organised and popular political force, capable of mobilising rapidly.
His obsession with keeping the AL sidelined exposes the fragility of his interim government. The use of suspension as a tool to block the partyโs activities is not neutral governance; it is panic-driven. Yunus fears that once the AL regains momentum, it could reclaim political space and challenge his authority. A caretaker government is supposed to operate impartially; Yunusโs approach undermines that principle.
February 15 election: Khaleda Ziaโs disgraceful record of rigging
Sheikh Hasina vows to bring Yunus, BNP, Jamaat, militants to justice
GCDG identifies bias, methodological flaws in OHCHR report on Bangladesh
This paradox is telling. On one hand, Yunus claims he is building democratic reforms to prevent โfascismโ from returning. On the other hand, he bends democratic norms to protect his temporary grip on power. The repeated emphasis on suspension and downplaying of support demonstrates that fear, not principle, is driving his decisions.
The Illusion of Choice: Yunus Blocks Opposition While Claiming Democracy
Bangladesh is facing a profound democratic crisis. By suspending the Awami League, Yunus has undermined the foundations of representative governance. Democracy is not simply holding elections; it is allowing all political voices, including dissenting ones, to participate freely. Yunusโs insistence that the AL cannot engage in political activity while remaining โvalidโ is a rhetorical sleight of hand masking authoritarian control.
Critics like Amartya Sen have warned that excluding a major political party is inherently anti-democratic. Yunus dismisses such concerns, arguing that the Election Commission can prevent the AL from contesting polls due to past actions. This reasoning is hollow: democracy cannot be preserved by silencing opposition; it requires accountability, oversight, and fair competition.
Yunusโs rhetoric frames the AL as unrepentant and violent, crafting a narrative to justify exclusion. The precedent is dangerous: political power in Bangladesh is no longer about winning consent, but about manipulating institutions and controlling narratives. The interview exposes a government claiming to safeguard democracy while actively dismantling its core components.
What the Interview Reveals About Yunusโs Mindset
The interview exposes Yunus as a leader riddled with contradictory, evasive, and inconsistent answers, with a deep obsession to keep the Awami League sidelined. He repeatedly claimed the party is โvalidโ yet suspended, downplayed its support, and asserted that the Election Commission alone decides which parties can participate, a blatant disregard for democratic principles.
His statement, โitโs our decision how long we stay,โ highlights an authoritarian mindset, signalling a willingness to extend power at will, unconcerned with public consent or electoral legitimacy. The repeated focus on blocking the AL reveals a government driven by fear, not governance. Yunus is less concerned with fair competition or the electorateโs will and more intent on maintaining control by suppressing Bangladeshโs most popular political force.
This interview is proof that Yunus fears real democracy. His contradictory, evasive, and controlling approach leaves no doubt: his assurances of democratic intent are hollow.
International Intervention: The Only Way to Restore Democracy
Bangladeshis cannot restore balance alone while the countryโs largest political party is forcibly sidelined. Yunusโs contradictory words and authoritarian actions demonstrate that without international pressure, there is little hope of free and fair elections.
Global institutions, including the UN, the European Union, and democratic nations, must intervene to ensure the Awami League can operate freely and that elections are conducted inclusively. The people of Bangladesh deserve a government accountable to them, not one that manipulates institutions to maintain temporary control.
If unchecked, Yunusโs interim government risks becoming a permanent authoritarian regime, silencing opposition and undermining the democratic rights of millions. The world cannot afford to ignore the warning signs revealed in this interview.
By albd.org
English