Issuing a powerful message marking Martyrs’ Day (Shaheed Dibas) and International Mother Language Day, Awami League President and five-time Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has warned against what she described as a deliberate conspiracy to obliterate Bengali national identity and impose a new, alien sense of self on the people of Bangladesh.
Her statement, released on February 20, comes at a time when critics accuse the Yunus-led interim regime of enabling a dangerous rise in religious extremism backed by Jamaat-e-Islami, Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), and Turkish ideological networks.
In her press release, Sheikh Hasina paid glowing tribute to the immortal martyrs of February 21, 1952—Salam, Barkat, Rafiq, Jabbar, and countless unnamed heroes—who sacrificed their lives demanding recognition of Bengali as a state language. She described the Language Movement as a timeless milestone in the centuries-long struggle for Bengali self-identification, tracing its roots to the resistance against Pakistan’s imposition of Urdu after the country’s creation on religious lines.
Highlighting Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman’s arrest on March 11, 1948, alongside comrades while organising the movement, Sheikh Hasina emphasised that February 21 became the cradle of Bengali nationalism, fueling the autonomy struggle and ultimately the Liberation War of 1971.
“February 21 is not merely a Language Martyrs’ Day; it has earned global recognition as International Mother Language Day,” Sheikh Hasina wrote. “We must honour our own language and national identity while respecting every mother tongue and ethnic identity worldwide—this is the true philosophy of Ekushey.”
Sajeeb Wazed asks BNP government not to endorse Awami League ban
Trump pushes for controversial defense deals in letter to Tarique Rahman
Jamaat’s 77 seats signal continuation of militancy, mob violence under BNP rule
Yet, Sheikh Hasina warned, this hard-won legacy is under grave threat. “Unfortunately, a conspiracy is now afoot to erase Bengali national identity from the Constitution, to wipe out the words spoken from the heart of Bengalis and forcibly implant a new identity through coercion,” she declared. “We are realising that the struggle to preserve our self-respect is far from over.”
Her pointed remarks have fueled speculation that the Yunus administration—now in its 18th month—has created fertile ground for extremist forces to undermine secular Bengali nationalism. Since August 2024, Jamaat-e-Islami and its student wing, Islami Chhatra Shibir have enjoyed unprecedented freedom of operation, openly organising rallies, reopening madrasas, and pushing for religious governance models.
Reports from multiple districts indicate increased funding flows—channelled through Pakistani ISI-linked networks—to Jamaat-affiliated charities and educational institutions.
Observers also point to growing Turkish influence, with several pro-government figures and media outlets echoing Ankara’s neo-Ottoman rhetoric and promoting pan-Islamic narratives that sideline Bengali cultural distinctiveness. Critics argue that the regime’s tolerance—or even tacit encouragement—of these elements aligns with a broader agenda to dilute the secular, linguistic foundations of Bangladeshi identity established through the Language Movement and Liberation War.
Why does Jamaat-patron US want a weak government in Bangladesh?
Yunus-Jamaat fascist regime turns judiciary into a slaughterhouse
Jamaat’s View On Women: Mia Golam Porwar masks deep-seated misogyny
Sheikh Hasina’s message called for unity in the spirit of Ekushey to confront “all evil forces and conspiracies.” She urged Bengalis to remain vigilant, declaring: “Let the people of Bengal be free; let the victory of the people of Bengal prevail.”
As Shaheed Dibos and International Mother Language Day approach on February 21, her words have resonated deeply among Awami League supporters and secular activists, who see them as a clarion call to resist what they describe as an existential threat to Bengali nationhood.
With the regime facing mounting criticism over law-and-order breakdowns, political repression, and the unchecked rise of religious hardliners, Sheikh Hasina’s warning underscores a deepening national divide: one side clinging to the secular, linguistic legacy of 1952 and 1971, the other accused of allowing foreign-backed extremism to erode it from within.
The coming days will test whether the spirit of Ekushey can still unite a fractured nation against those seeking to rewrite its very identity.
Bengali 
English