By Rafael Khan
Since the so-called “July Revolution” of August 5, now appearing as the “Sniper Revolution,” a wave of orchestrated mob violence has engulfed Bangladesh, shaking the very foundations of law, governance, and national unity. What began as street-level agitation has morphed into what many are now calling a Sniper Revolution, allegedly backed by transnational networks, deep state actors, and even UN-aligned agendas.
At the centre of the storm? Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus—a figure hailed abroad but increasingly scrutinised at home for his behind-the-scenes political manoeuvring.
The anatomy of a manufactured uprising
The July Revolution wasn’t a spontaneous people’s movement. Rather, it appears to have been a carefully engineered destabilisation campaign, blending social unrest, digital warfare, and international pressure. Mobs began appearing across urban centres—torching properties, attacking state institutions, and defying any form of authority. Law enforcement, often demoralised or politically cornered, found itself increasingly helpless.
Sheikh Hasina: We took steps to protect lives and property
Yunus is using database to crush Awami League, says Sheikh Hasina
Global Peace Index: Bangladesh slides as Nobel Peace laureate promotes mob violence
Mobocracy: Hindus assaulted for alleged blasphemy as perpetrators enjoy impunity
Provoked by Yunus, mob assaults ex-CEC Nurul Huda during arrest
Mobocracy: 172 killed in mob violence under Yunus regime
Sheikh Hasina slams Yunus for economic crisis, lies, mobocracy
Civil society slams Yunus government for police brutality, mob culture
What’s more disturbing is the shift in protest strategy. From mass gatherings to targeted assassinations and sniper attacks, the movement adopted an urban guerrilla flavour, raising fears of foreign training, funding, and coordination. Intelligence leaks suggest unusual communication patterns between domestic actors and global NGOs, some allegedly linked to intelligence services and political lobbies abroad.
Yunus and the deep state nexus?
The involvement of Muhammad Yunus—once the pride of Bangladesh—is no longer viewed through rose-tinted lenses. While international media still project him as a voice of peace and democracy, insiders claim Yunus has been leveraging his global connections to channel pressure against the state. His recent closed-door meetings with UN agencies, European diplomats, and international financial bodies have sparked alarm.
Sources within regional counterintelligence circles have dubbed this a “Deep State-backed sniper revolution”—a ”covert attempt to delegitimise the existing political structure and make the case for external intervention under humanitarian pretexts.
UN peacekeeping or soft occupation?
With growing instability and media reports highlighting “widespread human rights violations,” the UN is reportedly reviewing contingency plans for a peacekeeping presence—“only if requested.” But sceptics warn that such an invitation could be engineered by internal proxies, creating a legal cover for what would amount to a soft invasion.
“History shows us how mob culture can be used to collapse a sovereign state from within,” said a former intelligence officer. “And when the system fails, foreign boots follow—not as guests, but as arbiters of a new political order.”
The failure of rule of law: a gateway drug for global actors
The collapse of law enforcement credibility has created a vacuum—one that external actors are more than eager to fill. As mobs roam free and the judiciary appears neutered, the path is being paved for international arbitration, sanctions, or even direct governance models under the guise of restoring order.
Already, calls are being made in foreign parliaments and human rights bodies, demanding an “urgent response to the Bangladesh crisis.”
A nation on the brink
Bangladesh is no stranger to political chaos. But the post-5th August scenario is not just about protests—it’s about geopolitical realignment, elite betrayal, and the resurrection of colonial mechanisms under modern names.
If this continues unchecked, the mob culture won’t just bring down a government—it may open the gates for foreign occupation, masked behind blue helmets, lofty speeches, and digital propaganda.
The only way forward is to restore the rule of law, assert sovereignty, and expose the networks—both domestic and foreign—that are using the people of Bangladesh as pawns in a global chessboard.
Rafael Khan: Writer, Political Analyst
Bengali 
English