As the Jamaat-controlled interim government, led by Western puppet and conspirator Muhammad Yunus, aims to cling to power through different means, the popular demand for a quick transition to democracy through polls is gaining massive support.
The demand is mounting due to the governmentโs authoritative rule, patronisation of mobs, corruption by advisers and student representatives, and taking sensitive decisions like the Rakhine corridor and awarding Chittagong Port handling to a foreign company.
Moreover, after the Bangladesh Army released the list of people who took shelter in various cantonments on August 5, it became clear that no full court hearing was held under the leadership of the then-Chief Justice to give an opinion on the formation of the interim government.
The Law Ministry also could not show the resignation letter of the former prime minister, Sheikh Hasina, even though the army chief on August 5 said that she had resigned before leaving for India on a military aircraft.
The same night, President Mohammed Shahabuddin, in his address to the nation, said that Sheikh Hasina had tendered her resignation to him. At that time, the chiefs of the three forces were standing behind him.

All the local newspapers reported her resignation the next day. But no one could confirm whether she boarded the aircraft from Ganabhaban or Bangabhaban.
Other sources said she handed over her resignation letter to the parliament speaker or informed the president about her resignation verbally.
However, in her first audio message, Sheikh Hasina said that she did not resign. She did not get the scope to resign as per Article 67 of the Constitution.
Meanwhile, the Yunus Gang spread a fake resignation letter of the former prime minister on social media.
Speaking to the editor of Manabzamin, Matiur Rahman, the president said he did not have the resignation letter with him.

Law Adviser Prof Asif Nazrul also could not produce the resignation letter. As per the law, the ministry is supposed to issue a gazette after the prime minister resigns.
Again, after the story of the prime minister’s false resignation, the Supreme Court’s opinion was brought on the question of the validity of the interim government and reference was made to Article 106 of the Constitution.
But the Article 106 states: “If at any time it appears to be imminent that any question of this nature of law has been raised, or is likely to be raised, which is of such a nature and of such public importance that it is necessary to take the opinion of the Supreme Court on it. In that case, he may refer the question to the Appellate Division and that Division, after holding a hearing as it may deem fit, may inform the President of its opinion on the question.”
It is noteworthy that this kind of question means that the law must exist first, and then the president can seek the opinion of the Supreme Court on its interpretation.
But there is no law in the Constitution on the issue of the interim government.
In this regard, on August 6, the daily Prothom Alo, a harsh critic of the Awami League, published a sub-editorial by constitutional expert Dr Shahdeen Malik.
He boldly stated that the formation of an interim government was not constitutionally possible. He also told to BBC Bangla.
Needless to say, this was the last article by this regular writer after August 5. Later, Shahdeen Malik was removed from the Constitutional Reform Committee and replaced by American citizen and US deep state agent Prof Ali Riaz.
Hence, the entire government structure that was formed under the name of an interim government under the leadership of Dr Yunus outside the constitution was done through constitutional fraud.
Constitutional fraud was also detected in the Supreme Court’s reference.
Recently, the ISPR released the list of people in military custody on August 5, which shows that the then-Chief Justice Obaidul Hassan and Justice M Enayetur Rahim were in the cantonment with their families.
So, how did they participate in this hearing?
That means the Chief Justice was not present at the full court meeting. And there is no mention anywhere in this reference that this hearing was held virtually.
The main thing is that Sheikh Hasina did not resign.
Sheikh Hasina is still the legitimate prime minister of Bangladesh; the Yunus gang knows that very well. That is why they want the Constitution to be annulled; they want the July Charter and the resignation of the president and the army chief.
They know very well that they have no constitutional basis and no legitimacy. Now what is left is the trial of the Yunus gang, who seized power illegally.