Farmers\u2019 rights and welfare have once again come into the spotlight in Bangladesh, as past grievances are being compared with present-day policies, sparking renewed debate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In 2001, during the government led by Khaleda Zia, there were allegations that farmers protesting for fertilizer were shot by law enforcement. The incident remains a controversial chapter in the country\u2019s political history. Critics are now revisiting that memory to argue that neglect and injustice toward farmers may still persist, albeit in different forms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The recently introduced \u201cAgricultural Card\u201d program has also drawn criticism. Under the scheme, farmers are promised financial assistance of 2,500 taka per year. However, critics argue that this amount is far too small to meet the real needs of farmers. When broken down, it amounts to only about 6.66 taka per day\u2014an amount many say is insufficient even for basic expenses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Meanwhile, allegations of irregularities have emerged from Tangail district regarding the distribution of these cards. According to local sources, instead of genuine farmers, a political party member was reportedly registered as a farmer and granted the card. The issue has since gained traction on social media, triggering widespread criticism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Authorities have yet to provide a clear response to these allegations. Agricultural experts emphasize the need for more realistic and transparent support systems that reflect the actual needs of farmers. They also stress the importance of accountability in the distribution process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
As agriculture remains a key pillar of Bangladesh\u2019s economy, analysts and citizens alike are calling for more responsible policymaking to protect the interests of millions of farmers across the country.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Farmers\u2019 rights and welfare have once again come into the spotlight in Bangladesh, as past grievances are being compared with present-day policies, sparking renewed debate. In 2001, during the government… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":7350,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[43,20],"tags":[46,50,65,56],"class_list":["post-7349","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-crime","category-news","tag-bnp","tag-interim-government","tag-mobocracy","tag-muhammad-yunus"],"brizy_media":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyrepublicbd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7349","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyrepublicbd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyrepublicbd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyrepublicbd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyrepublicbd.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7349"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dailyrepublicbd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7349\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7351,"href":"https:\/\/dailyrepublicbd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7349\/revisions\/7351"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyrepublicbd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/7350"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyrepublicbd.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7349"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyrepublicbd.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7349"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyrepublicbd.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7349"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}